Literary travel habits

By Fredegonde, April 26, 2010

Weekly Geeks badgeThis week Wendy says, “I love reading novels which represent different countries around the world — either the author lives in that country or the book is based in that country. I have a personal challenge to read at least one novel for every country in the world… and I’m not the only blogger out there who is striving to do that. But even if you are not motivated to experience every country through books, many readers enjoy traveling the world through books… Do you deliberately read globally, and if so, do you track your reading in this area?”

Well, I have to say, no I don’t deliberately read globally. I tend to choose my next read pretty haphazardly. When I come across a review of something that strikes my fancy I just zip on over to my library website and put in a request. And when I go to pick up my holds, I often make a point of checking out a random book or two that looks interesting but that I’ve never heard of. My current Random Read (hmmm, sounds like a meme in the making…) actually is “global” — it’s Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimimanda Ngozi Adichi — but I can’t honestly say I chose it because it’s global.

One thing that is a big obstacle for me in reading more globally is that the mental block I have about reading books with co-authors also applies to works in translation. I always worry, what if it’s not a good translation? What if the original author’s intent isn’t coming through? And how would I even know? Now that would be a good challenge for myself. I’ve been thinking about “books outside my comfort zone” since reading this Bookworms Carnival post. Books in translation… hmmm….

Dogeared, oy!

By Fredegonde, April 21, 2010

I discovered and signed up for the Dogeared Reading Challenge just two days after posting my thoughts on re-reading my very battered copy of The Mists of Avalon, and since I actually mentioned the condition of the book in the original post, I’ve decided that I can count it towards the challenge.

So here is a photo. As you can see, both front and back covers and the title page have come off completely, and the last few pages are still attached to the back cover instead of the rest of the book. You can’t see the spine very well in this shot but it is quite scored. Notice, too, how the once-white pages are now a lovely shade of, um, brown.

photo of battered book, both covers off, pages torn and yellow

I bought this book brand-new, by the way. It must have been twenty five years ago, but still. I think they could have designed it better. The volume is quite heavy, even for an over-sized paperback, and if they had used a lighter weight of paper I suspect the covers would have had less of a chance of ripping off. Archive-quality paper would have been nice, too. Yeah, they should have known that despite its cheesiness this is a book that some gluttons for punishment *ahem* would want to reread and reread and reread…

The Invention of Air, by Steven Johnson

By Fredegonde, April 19, 2010
portrait

Joseph Priestley, 1733–1804

This past weekend was a busy one with lots of family obligations and so forth — not the kind of weekend where I would normally expect to get much reading done at all. Let alone read an entire NONFICTION book from start to finish. Whoa!

The Invention of Air proclaims itself to be “A Story of Science, Faith, Revolution, and the Birth of America” — and so it is: all wrapped up in the biography of a single man, Joseph Priestley. If this book were just a biography, it still would be awesome. Priestley, you may recall, is best-known for having “discovered” oxygen, but it turns out he did much more than that. He also invented soda water, discovered the carbon cycle, founded the Unitarian Church, and profoundly influenced both Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson. In addition, he was a generous, warm-hearted, affable gentleman who preferred to spend his evenings playing chess with his wife or romping on the lawn with his kids.

This book is chock full of charming details like that, but it also paints a much broader picture in attempting to answer the question of how one single individual came to be so important in so many different, seemingly-unrelated ways. Johnson not only traces the intellectual, cultural, social and political trends that led to the Age of Enlightenment, but he actually goes back as far as the Carboniferous era (!) in his quest to figure out how and why a phenomenon like Priestley arose. If you are familiar with the fabulous TV series Connections, this is very much in the same vein.

I have long been fascinated by eighteenth and nineteenth century scientists. I just love the idea of those “natural philosphers” — gentlemen, usually, who spent their leisure time studying the world around them, dissecting their specimens, experimenting with electricity, making careful notes in their diaries, and presenting their findings at the Royal Society. Johnson talks about that:

[T]he networked, caffeinated minds of the eighteenth century found themselves in a universe that was ripe for discovery. The everyday world was teeming with mysterious phenomena — air, fire, animals, plants, rocks, weather — that had never before been probed with the conceptual tools of the scientific method. This sense of terra incognita also helps explain why Priestley could be so innovative in so many different disciplines, and why Enlightenment culture in general spawned so many distinct paradigm shifts. Amateur dabblers could make transformative scientific discoveries because the history of each field was an embarrassing lineage of conjecture and superstition. Every discipline was suddenly new again. (55)

And he goes on to quote Priestley himself, who wrote:

In electricity, in particular, there is a greatest room to make new discoveries. It is a field but just opened, and requires no great slock of particular preparatory knowledge; so that any person who is tolerably well versed in experimental philosophy may presently be upon a level with the most experienced electricians. (55)

When I first read that, I thought too bad we don’t have that any more. Science has become so specialized there is no way one person could “dabble” like that, these days. But it’s a funny thing, because here I am, a fortyish soccer mom and “amateur dabbler” in that “field but just opened,” the internet. I’m self-taught, through experimental trial and error, just like Priestley. I’ve gotten to be pretty handy with HTML, CSS, and PHP and I’ve just started writing my first WordPress plugin. If I’m successful, I’ll release it to the “networked, caffeinated minds” of the twenty-first century and it’ll become part of the great flow of information that Johnson describes.

book coverBut, I digress. As I was saying, The Invention of Air is not only fascinating in the way it draws together such disparate threads, but it’s also incredibly entertaining. The author is a journalist, not a historian, and despite the academic-ish subject matter, it reads effortlessly. The footnotes are well hidden, and it’s clearly intended for a lay audience. I don’t know if an actual historian (or chemist or theologian) would quibble with the author on any of the points he raises, but it all made sense and sounded good to me!

And I must say, the book is beautifully designed. The text is light on the page, with generous margins & leading, and soft creamy paper. Yum!

Yikes! Poetry!

By Fredegonde, April 17, 2010

Weekly Geeks badgeIn honor of National Poetry Month, this week’s Weekly Geek features — you guessed it! — poetry: “Post a favorite poem; review a poem or book of poems; discuss a favorite poet, post a video of someone else reading one; write a poem yourself; or come up with something I haven’t thought of to celebrate.”

*gulp* Poetry! Why is poetry so scary? I’m embarrassed that I don’t read more of it. I mean, I am a pretty close reader; I pay attention to individual words and writerly techniques; I love poetic prose. And yet, whenever I try to read serious poetry I feel intimidated and nervous, and I always assume I’m not “getting” it.

Well, actually, there is one poet whom I love and feel a strong connection with, even though she lived on another continent and was born more than 2,500 years ago. Isn’t that strange?

Sleep, darling

I have a small
daughter called
Cleis, who is

like a golden
flower
          I wouldn’t
take all Croesus’
kingdom with love
thrown in, for her

On second thought, maybe it’s not so strange. Some things are simply universal. Like Sappho, I too have a daughter who is like a golden flower. I wouldn’t take all Croesus’ kingdom for her either, no not even with love thrown in.

Invasive Procedures, by Orson Scott Card and Aaron Johnston

By Fredegonde, April 16, 2010

book coverFull disclosure: I read my first Orson Scott Card novel, which happened to be Ender’s Game, some time in the late 1980s. I was so totally blown away by it that I immediately sought out every other book of his that I could find. I bought his subsequent books in hardcover (!) the moment they hit the stores, unable to wait for the library. I even read the religious ones, like Saints and Stone Tables. There may be a Card book out there that I didn’t read, but not for lack of trying.

Now, I will admit that his books are somewhat uneven in quality. None of the later Ender books or any of the “parallel” novels come even close to the incredible amazingness of Ender’s Game and Speaker for the Dead. The Homecoming and Alvin series also deteriorate the farther in you read. And in recent years I’ve been a bit disenchanted (to put it mildly) with his politics. Even so, Card feels like family to me: I love him even though he’s annoying, I can always find something to like in his books, and even though I don’t search him out as avidly as I once did, I’ll never give up on him.

So… with that out of the way, let me tell you about Invasive Procedures. It’s a sci-fi thriller about genetic engineering. Insane Evil Megalomaniac has developed a virus type thing that can cure genetic diseases like sickle cell anemia. The problem is: 1) the virus must be individually engineered for each person, and if anyone else but the patient comes in contact with it, they’ll die instantly and painfully; and 2) this same virus can also be engineered to do other things such as create a powerful army of giants who want nothing but to help Insane Evil Megalomaniac take over the world. Luckily, there is a Hero With A Tragic Past And A Brilliant Beautiful Heroine At His Side who saves the day with a combination of brains and brawn because he is a whiz at both genetic engineering AND martial arts.

Sounds pretty ridiculous, huh. However, something like this, written by Orson Scott Card of all people, could be terrific. Knowing Card, it would probably be filled with fascinating explorations of the morality of genetic engineering; a water-tight plot; charismatic, three-dimensional characters; and story-telling so compelling that you don’t even notice how absurd the basic premise is.

Alas, no. This book is just another dumb thriller, with stock characters, predictable twists, and no “value added” to the plot whatsoever. I think my biggest disappointment was the bad guy, actually. It’s the worst kind of cop-out when the bad guy is simply… insane. Insane Evil Megalomaniacs are all very well for comic books and trashy action movies and even James Bond, but if you are writing a serious book, please give me a real reason why the bad guy is bad. If he’s insane, I want to know why. I want to understand where he is coming from. And Orson Scott Card is a master at that — think Moozh, Peter Wiggin, etc. They are fascinating, complex characters that you can sympathize with, sort of, even when they do bad stuff or plot to take over the world.

Perhaps it is pointless to ponder why this book turned out so bad, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that Card had a co-author on this one. Aaron Johnston, who is described on the flap as “a successful Hollywood screenwriter” (although I can’t find evidence of any actual movie credits in his name), apparently adapted one of Card’s short stories into a screenplay, and then Card and Johnston together adapted the screenplay into this novel. And Invasive Procedures does feel like it was meant to be a movie, what with high-tech medical equipment, secret operating rooms, helicopters, burning buildings, guys in biohazard suits, and a big climactic scene on the subway train (I’m sure you can guess!). Standard Hollywood stuff, all of it.

It’s a funny thing, but I am extremely prejudiced against co-authored novels. When I read a novel I feel a deep connection with the author, I suppose because I am reading his or her own unadulterated words, and I think a lot about the author’s intent while I’m reading. The mere existence of co-authors, therefore, is a huge barrier for my appreciation of a novel, because it’s impossible to tease out which aspects of the story come from each writer. I think that’s also why I’ve never been very interested in movies — sure I like ‘em, but they don’t mean to me what books do because there is no single author that I can connect with. In this case, though, I’m kinda glad that there was a co-author because I can blame the yuckiness of the book on him and keep my faint but still lingering crush on Card intact. :-)

Beginnings

By Fredegonde, April 15, 2010

Booking thru Thursday badgeThis week, Booking Through Thursday asks: Which end? In general, do you prefer the beginnings of stories? Or the ends?

Ooooh! This is so easy! The beginnings! Always the beginnings!

I am much more interested in the exposition than I am in finding out how the plot is resolved. I am endlessly fascinated by the myriad ways in which writers can clue the reader in, whether it’s an exotic setting, important backstory, or simply the characters’ personalities. How that information unfolds, how the author reveals what we need to know, that is what I love the most. Often while reading, and even more often while watching a movie, I get to a point where I think “okay, I get it, I get where this is going” — and at that point I may quit or force myself to finish, but either way I’m rarely interested in those plot details. Getting started is so much better than arriving.

Top Ten most challenged books of 2009

By Fredegonde, April 14, 2010

image of a book with caption I read banned books, and my kids do tooWell, Banned Books Week isn’t until September, but if you’d like to get a head start on planning what you’re going to read that week, you could check out today’s press release from the American Library Association, listing the top ten most challenged books of 2009. Number one on the list is the “TTYL” series by Lauren Myracle. I’m looking forward to reading it.

Booklist: Librarians recommend!

By Fredegonde, April 12, 2010

In honor of National Library Week I thought it would be fun to compile a list of my family’s favorite books that specifically were recommended by librarians — books that we might never have discovered otherwise. So we went around the dinner table and here are a few of the titles we came up with:

  • book coverEyewitness: Car, by Robert Sutton. My 6yo says he asked the school librarian for a book about “how cars work” and she gave him this. If you’ve ever seen an Eyewitness book, you can imagine what this one is like. Basically, it’s a visual dictionary. Photographs, and lots of captions. In fact my son did carry this book around in his backpack for several weeks.
  • book coverThe Chocolate Touch, by Patrick Skene Catling. My daughter read this in second grade, she said, after the school librarian said she might like it. The librarian was correct; she loved it. It is a retelling of the King Midas story, only — you guessed it — instead of gold, everything he touches turns to chocolate. Yum!
  • Tacky the Penguin, by Helen Lester. This charming, goofy picture book is part of my kids’ elementary school library tradition. I believe it gets read to every class, every year. By the time the graduating fifth graders have it ceremoniously read to them for the very last time, there isn’t a dry eye in the house. We have a copy at home and I read it to my youngest at least once a week. It’s a great one to read out loud.
  • book coverJanitor’s Boy, by Andrew Clements. The school librarian turned my older son onto this and many other books by Andrew Clements when he was in fourth and fifth grade. I have read a few of them myself and I think they are excellent. They are somewhat Judy Blume-like in their treatment of kids’ issues, but not so dated and with more of a focus on pre-teens than adolescents.
  • book coverThe Silver Crown, by Robert C. O’Brien. When I was in elementary school our librarian had the annoying habit of reading just the first chapter or two of a book in order to pique our interest. Often that would result in a mad dash for the book, and if there weren’t many copies you might have to wait a week or two for your turn. The Silver Crown was one like that: I remember the incredible beginning of the story (she wakes up on her birthday and finds a mysterious crown on her pillow) and then having to wait impatiently to finish it. This is by the same author who wrote Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH, by the way.
  • book coverSwallows and Amazons, by Arthur C. Ransome. Another one of mine. The librarian set this book aside just for me when I was in sixth grade and I remember feeling very special and privileged because of it. This is the first of a series about British kids who go sailing and have adventures all by themselves, and it was the beginning of my lifelong love affair with Nautical Lit. Forever grateful to you, Mrs. Clark, wherever you are.
  • book coverDoc Savage series. This was my husband’s contribution. He wasn’t sure if it “counted” because the first book in the series was given to him by his aunt, who happens to be a school librarian. I think it counts! Anyway, I have never read these myself, but knowing my husband (and judging by the cover) I imagine they are a lot of fun to read.

So… thank you, librarians! You rock!

Dogeared Reading Challenge

By Fredegonde, April 11, 2010

challenge badgeHa ha ha! No sooner did I finish posting about The Mists of Avalon, in which I described my copy as “quite battered, with covers torn off, pages yellow and dog-eared, spine scored” than I came across this reading challenge at DogEar Diary:

This reading challenge is about appreciating the old, worn-out and beat-up books we come across. They’re out there, and perhaps they’re feeling neglected—hoping they don’t get shuffled long enough to end up in the recycling (or worse, trash). So let’s give them some love! For the Dogeared Challenge, you have to read dog-eared, torn, stained, wrinkled, falling-apart or otherwise in-bad-condition books.

This whole idea of reading challenges is kind of interesting and I’m just starting to explore it. I love love love the idea of reading along a theme — I am always bugging my IRL book group to do something thematic, even if it’s just reading several books in a row by the same author — but on the other hand I don’t like the feeling that I would have to read (and post about!) x books by y date. I know this is just a blog, not an English class, but still!

That said… what I like about this particular challenge is that it will take no special effort at all, ha ha. My own shelves are filled with dog-eared books already, and if that’s not enough, they’re always easy to find at the library. And as a bonus, I’ve already got the first one read! Stay tuned, and as soon as I get a chance I will post some photos of this poor pathetic book.

* * *

Do you participate in reading challenges? Do you ever feel “under pressure” to finish? What do you like or not like about them?

A guilty pleasure

By Fredegonde, April 9, 2010

book coverIn need of a comfort re-read, I pulled The Mists of Avalon off my shelf. Tee hee, it is every bit as bad as I remember it.

It’s been a while since I last read The Mists of Avalon. There are other books I return to much more often. Still, I’ve returned to this one often enough that my copy is quite battered, with covers torn off, pages yellow and dog-eared, spine scored.

As you probably know, this book is a retelling of the Arthurian legend, from the point of view of Morgaine (a/k/a Morgan Le Fay). Some of the main ingredients include:

  • pagans versus Christians
  • strong female characters
  • Celtic druids
  • Welsh spellings
  • forbidden/tempestuous love
  • the Sight (with a capital S, of course)
  • phases of the moon
  • fairy folk

So what’s wrong with that? Absolutely nothing! There is lots to like in this book, including my favorite literary theme of having the good guys be not completely good and the bad guys not completely bad. For example, Gwenhwyfar. Don’t you just want to slap that ninny? But… you can also understand where she’s coming from, and sort of sympathize.

And yet, this book does feel like a guilty pleasure. Why, I am not sure. I mean yes, the above list of ingredients smacks of pulp fantasy, generally frowned upon by more erudite types. But I can think of other examples of the genre that I like a lot and am not embarrassed to admit it. Like Azure Bonds, which is pure Dungeons & Dragons, but so hilariously tongue-in-cheek that it is sheer pleasure to read.

I think that’s it. The Mists of Avalon takes itself so damn seriously. There is not an ounce of humor or irony in it anywhere. Everything is a portent, a matter of life and death, with the fate of an entire nation hanging in the balance. And the writing style reflects it. Pure melodrama. You know:

“But where shall we find such a king?” Igraine asked. “Who shall give us such a leader?”

And then, suddenly, she was afraid, felt ice pouring down her back, as the Merlin and the priestess turned to look at her, their eyes seeming to hold her motionless as a small bird under the shadow of a great hawk, and she understood why the messenger-prophet of the Druids was called the Merlin.

But when Viviane spoke her voice was very soft.

She said, “You, Igraine. You shall bear this Great King.”

Ugh, that is embarrassing to read. But I love it!

Freddie Reads is powered by WordPress and Panorama (with some modifications).